nuebe gaming com

Liz Kendall tells Brits “if you can work you must” and she will axe benefits for young adults who refuse work & trainingLOS ANGELES (AP) — Londynn Jones scored 15 points, making all five of her 3-pointers, and fifth-ranked UCLA stunned No. 1 South Carolina 77-62 on Sunday, ending the Gamecocks’ overall 43-game winning streak and their run of 33 consecutive road victories. The Gamecocks (5-1) lost for the first time since April 2023, when Caitlin Clark and Iowa beat them in the NCAA Tournament national semifinals. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.On June 20, 1979, President Jimmy Carter invited reporters up to the White House roof for a ceremony to inaugurate the installation of 32 solar water-heating panels. America was in the midst of an energy freak-out, with long lines at gas stations and not-crazy fear that the U.S. economy was going to be starved by its dependence on foreign oil. And Carter was paying the price: his approval rating was 28 percent, the lowest of his presidency. On that summer day, Carter acknowledged that “some few Americans have reached a state of panic.” But instead of pandering to Americans and promising more oil and gas, he challenged them, insisting that “America was not built on timidity or panic.” Carter announced that he was committed to spending more than $1 billion “to stimulate solar and other renewable forms of energy,” in the expectation that within two decades 20 percent of the nation’s energy would be generated by solar power. “In the year 2000,” Carter told the crowd on the rooftop that day, “this solar water heater behind me... will still be here supplying cheap, efficient energy.” Then he added, prophetically, “A generation from now, this solar heater can either be a curiosity, a museum piece, an example of a road not taken, or it can be just a small part of one of the greatest and most exciting adventures ever undertaken by the American people.” Obviously, America did not take the road toward clean energy that Carter pointed toward on that day. In 1979, the U.S. relied on fossil fuels for about 90 percent of primary energy consumption. Today, fossil fuels still provide about 80 percent of the power consumed in America. But America’s failure is not Jimmy Carter’s failure. In fact, Carter had a visionary understanding of the road ahead, which only grows more profound with each passing year. “President Carter belongs at the top of any list of the greatest environmental presidents in American history,” says Gus Speth, chairman of Carter’s Council on Environmental Quality and a pioneering figure in the environmental movement. Editor’s picks The 100 Best TV Episodes of All Time The 250 Greatest Guitarists of All Time The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time The 200 Greatest Singers of All Time It is a fair claim. Thomas Jefferson sent Lewis and Clark off to explore the West, vastly expanding scientific knowledge of the natural world. Teddy Roosevelt was a rugged outdoorsman who created more than 190 million acres of new national forests, parks, and monuments. Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” plan was also responsible for the creation of the Wilderness Act of 1964 and the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966. Impeached crook Richard Nixon founded the Environmental Protection Agency and the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Barack Obama passed the Clean Power Plan and signed the Paris Climate Agreement. Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act will funnel $370 billion into climate and energy projects over the next decade. But it was Carter who first addressed the essential fact of our time, which is that modern life as we know it today has been both created by and is being destroyed by our entanglement with fossil fuels. “The challenge facing this country is the moral equivalent of war,” Carter said in 1979. He was talking about the threat from OPEC oil producers to strangle the U.S. economy with high oil prices, not the threat of rising CO2 pollution to cook the planet. But it hardly mattered. He was the Greta Thunberg of the 1970s, saying bold, politically blunt things about greed and consumption and fossil fuel addiction that nobody wanted to hear. And this was all the more remarkable because he was not a Swedish teenager. He was the President of the United States. Carter grew up barefoot and poor on a farm in southwestern Georgia. The farm had no electricity or running water, no diesel-fueled tractors, and of course no air-conditioning. He sweated in the fields with the other farmhands and felt the red dirt between his toes. He fished in the nearby rivers and lakes and learned to castrate a pig before he was old enough to drive and ate family meals of slaughtered steer brains mixed with scrambled eggs. But Carter was also a pragmatist. When he was 11, his father installed a windmill on their farm, giving them running water for the first time and showing young Jimmy the power of renewable energy. In the Navy, he became a nuclear engineer and risked his life to defuse a meltdown in an experimental nuclear reactor in Canada. Related Content Jimmy Carter, U.S. President and Prolific Humanitarian, Dead at 100 Trump EPA Pick Lee Zeldin Is Fossil Fuel’s Inside Man The Battle Against Trump 2.0 Begins in the States Green Energy Depends on Copper. 40 Billion Pounds Are Under an Apache Holy Site He also happened to be president during an energy crisis, when many Americans first woke up to the political and economic consequences of their fossil-fuel powered lives. As gas stations shut down in the 1970s and prices spiraled, Americans were at once terrified and angry. “Carter understood the dangers of fossil fuels from the geopolitics of it, which smacked him upside the head,” says Dan Dudek, a former senior economist with the Environmental Defense Fund. “How much of an environmental motivation he had for his actions is tough to say. But does that matter?” Whatever Carter’s motivation may have been, his record on energy and environmental issues is clear. In his four years in office, he signed 15 major pieces of environmental legislation, including the first toxic waste cleanup and the first fuel-economy standards. His two major legislative accomplishments, the National Energy Act of 1978 and the Energy Security Act of 1980, transformed the energy landscape of America. “So much happened in his four years and we still live with his administration’s effects today,” says Michael Webber, the Josey Centennial Professor in Energy Resources at the University of Texas, Austin and the author of Power Shift: The Story of Energy . Among other things, the legislation created the Department of Energy, which elevated energy to a cabinet-level priority and dramatically increased funding for energy research and development. The legislation also began the deregulation of gas and power sectors, which opened the door for cheaper, cleaner power. “The decarbonization and decentralization that is well on its way in the electric utility industry today can be credited in large part to the policies started in the Carter Administration,” says James Van Nostrand, a law professor at West Virginia University and author of The Coal Trap: How West Virginia Was Left Behind in the Clean Energy Revolution. Van Nostrand points to the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978 (PURPA), which was part of the National Energy Act and broke up the power of electric utilities and encouraged competition in electricity generation markets. “All the competition that currently exists in the wholesale power markets can be traced back to the original incarnation of PURPA in 1978,” says Van Nostrand. PURPA also encouraged small power production facilities, primarily cogeneration and hydro. “A lot of what we know about distributed energy resources can be traced back to encouraging cogeneration, which is a much more efficient way to generate electricity, by capturing the waste heat and using it for some other industrial process,” says Van Nostrand. PURPA also required state regulators to think differently about how electricity is priced, encouraging time-of-use rates and requiring utilities to use load management techniques, which we now know today as demand response, to reduce energy usage. None of this came without a fight. “The influence of the oil and gas industry is unbelievable,” Carter once complained, “and it’s impossible to arouse the public to protect themselves.” Although Carter’s biggest accomplishments were in transforming the energy landscape, he also did more to protect America’s wild places than any president since Teddy Roosevelt. The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (1980), which Carter engineered through a clever usage of executive power in the Antiquities Act, provided various levels of protection to 157 million acres — an area roughly the size of California and Oregon combined. Carter’s energy and environmental legacy is not unblemished or uncontroversial. Gus Speth credits Carter for halting a headlong rush to build a new fleet of breeder reactors for electricity generation. “He stopped the plutonium economy before it could get started,” Speth argues. But other energy experts fault Carter for banning the reprocessing of nuclear waste, which essentially killed the evolution of nuclear power in the U.S. “As our one and only nuclear engineer president, he gutted the American nuclear industry forever with his decision not to reprocess nuclear waste,” Webber says. “He knew too much and the risks that reprocessing would enable loose weapons grade materials in a decade rife with terrorism made him nervous; we pay the price for that today.” Carter is also responsible for the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 , which Webber calls “one of our worse energy policies ever.” Webber argues that the legislation banned new natural gas power plants, leading to the development of 80 gigawatts of coal instead. “That’s had huge greenhouse gas and air pollution consequences that still live with us today,” Webber says. On climate, Carter understood the threat of rising CO2 pollution as well as any scientist of his time. “Carter had started studying the issue in 1971,” biographer Jonathan Alter has said. “I found in his files from when he was governor underlinings in the journal Nature about carbon pollution and global warming. Other politicians played golf — Carter played tennis — but he was reading scientific journals. That’s how he got his jollies.” By the time Carter took office, the risks of climate change were becoming well-documented throughout the federal government. Barely six months into Carter’s term, Frank Press, the President’s science adviser sent him a memorandum summarizing the threat from the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and the warming that would result from it. “The urgency of the problem derives from our inability to shift rapidly to non-fossil fuel sources once the climatic effects become evident not long after the year 2000; the situation could grow out of control before alternate energy sources and other remedial actions become effective.” Although Press did not call for emergency action, he advised Carter that “we must now take the potential CO2 hazard into account in developing our long-term energy strategy.” Other climate reports followed, including one in 1979 by a group of top scientists headed by meteorologist Jule Charney, titled “Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment.” The Charney report, which is now remembered by historians as a prime example of how well scientists understood the threat of climate change nearly a half-century ago, stated that when the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere doubled, the planet would most likely warm by three degrees Celsius — a calculation that is remarkably close to the best estimates today. “A warming ... will probably be conspicuous within the next twenty years,” the report read, calling for early action: “Enlightened policies in the management of fossil fuels and forests can delay or avoid these changes, but the time for implementing the policies is fast passing.” Another report at the very end of Carter’s presidency by the White House Council on Environmental Quality reached similar conclusions. None of it was news to Carter, who directed the National Academy of Sciences to prepare a comprehensive, $1 million analysis of the greenhouse effect. “Carter was the first leader anywhere in the world who considered [climate change] a problem,” says Alter. Although Carter talked about the risks of rising CO2 levels in several speeches, he never launched a campaign to directly confront climate change — in part because he was too consumed with the energy crisis in real-time and in part because he was too consumed with the politics of getting re-elected. If he had won a second term, would he have sounded the climate alarm? It would have been a complicated call for Carter, if only because he had backed coal — the most carbon-intensive of all fossil fuels — and synthetic fuels as a way to get off imported oil. But it’s hard to imagine that Carter would not have pushed global warming forward as a major issue. “It’s been enormously frustrating to realize that if we had started with Carter and continued after his administration, we could have been on a smooth trajectory to reduce fossil fuel use,” Speth says. “If that had happened, we could be getting out of the fossil fuel business right now. But, of course, that’s not what happened.” What happened was Ronald Reagan. Reagan was the anti-Carter, a president who saw consumption as next to godliness and economic growth as a religious force. He ripped the solar panels off the White House roof and they ended up on a farm in Maine, at the Smithsonian, and at a solar exhibit in China. He cut clean energy research and reduced taxes on oil and gas and made America safe again for fossil fuel barons. “The big oil companies finally have a friend in the White House,” the New Republic reported soon after Reagan took office in 1981. And in many ways, America has never looked back. Carter had imaged that by 2020, America would be creating 20 percent of its electricity from the sun. The hard reality: In 2022, solar generated about 3 percent of U.S. electricity (all non-hydro renewables — wind, solar, biomass, geothermal — generate about 14 percent). Even more disturbing is the fact that U.S. CO2 emissions are about the same today as they were in 1976 when Carter took office. If you consider historical emissions, the U.S. is by far the largest contributor to the climate crisis. And without U.S. leadership, the climate crisis has only accelerated. From 1980 to 2019, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere grew from 339 parts per million to 419 ppm. “America’s energy policy of the last four decades is the greatest dereliction of civic responsibility in the history of the Republic,” Speth argues. Carter himself never gave up the fight. When he was 92, he installed 3,852 solar panels on his land in Plains, Georgia, which create enough electricity to power half of the town. It was a powerful reminder, if such a reminder were needed, that when Carter installed the solar panels on the White House in 1979, he had been right about the direction the world was going, even if he had been wrong about the timing. Perhaps the most enduring aspect of Carter’s legacy on energy and the environment is that it forces us to remember that where we are today has been a choice. Carter did his part, both as president and as a citizen. It’s not too late for us to do ours.nuebe gaming com 。

Is ‘Glicked’ the new ‘Barbenheimer’? ‘Wicked’ and ‘Gladiator II’ collide in theatersIstanbul, İzmir, Çanakkale, Nevşehir, Mardin, Şanlıurfa, Bursa and Kars Promote Different Cults of Tourism in Turkiye to Global Travel IndustryKlubnik's 3 TD passes, DT Page's pick-6 lead No. 17 Clemson to 51-14 win over The Citadel

No. 1 South Carolina women stunned by fifth-ranked UCLA 77-62, ending Gamecocks' 43-game win streak

The groundbreaking blockchain-based platform Rexas Finance (RXS) has mesmerized the cryptocurrency market. Designed to transform real estate tokenization into decentralized finance (DeFi), this altcoin mainly attracts big-money investors. Due to its exceptional performance and innovative use cases, Rexas Finance is quickly becoming a leading candidate to surpass market leaders Solana (SOL) and Ripple (XRP) by 2025. Rexas Finance (RXS): The Altcoin Drawing Attention From Investors Rexas Finance primarily distinguishes itself from competitors such as Solana and Ripple by prioritizing practical applications. Solana shines in fast blockchain transactions and Ripple in cross-border payments; Rexas Finance presents a special offer by combining DeFi with physical assets. With this strategic differentiator, it stands out as a solution that can adapt to the constantly shifting blockchain ecosystem with greater versatility and impact. Fundamentally, Rexas Finance tokenizes actual assets like property using innovative blockchain technology. This invention lets consumers access quick, open, safe financial services. By bridging the gap between traditional assets and scattered ecosystems, Rexas Finance redefines investor interaction with real estate. Tokenization enables fractional ownership, making high-value assets more reachable to a larger audience and boosting liquidity in an inactive sector. Rexas Finance is positioned to gain from the $486 trillion worldwide financial asset market with a market span including real estate, commodities, and financial assets. Its ETH-based token properties provide even more appeal and position RXS for a possible 10000% rise following launch. It started stage 11 of its presale at an astounding $0.175. With about 380 million tokens sold, the presale currently brings in over $33.1 million. These numbers highlight investors' rising faith in the platform's ability to provide significant profits. Rexas tokens are highly sought after because of their creative approach to DeFi and real estate tokenizing, which distinguishes them from other cryptocurrencies. Rexas Finance's listings on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko confirm its reliability even further. These sites are reliable sources of cryptocurrency data, and their respect for Rexas Finance emphasizes its validity and commercial applicability. Furthermore, top blockchain security company Certik has closely examined the initiative. Attracting institutional investors depends on Rexas Finance following the best standards of security and openness; hence, this accreditation guarantees these aspects. Investing in the RXS presale is easy and offers a chance to get tokens before the price hikes. Popular altcoins anticipated to develop quicker than Solana and Ripple are attracting enormous sums of money. Go to the official Rexas Finance website to guarantee a safe transaction and avoid fraud. Purchase RXS with defined tokens like Ethereum or USDT after linking your wallets—such as MetaMask or Trust Wallet. Once bought, keep your tokens in your wallet and monitor the presale stages to remain current on price adjustments and advancement. Rexas Finance has started a continuous $1 million giveaway to improve its community involvement further. Twenty fortunate members of this program will receive $50,000 of Rexas tokens apiece. Such rewards show the platform's dedication to honoring fans and promoting long-term devotion. Along with raising awareness, the offer draws a diverse spectrum of investors, from institutional players to retail consumers. Moreover, the significant money gathered during its presale and the increasing community support point to a strong basis for ongoing expansion. Rexas Finance is unique in its ability to provide innovation and practical value as the market increasingly embraces utility-driven initiatives. Conclusion With its ambitious ambition and established track record, Rexas Finance is well on its way to becoming a significant cryptocurrency market participant. The platform's capacity to tokenize real estate and link it with DeFi is consistent with the growing desire for practical blockchain applications. Furthermore, its recent accomplishments, such as raising over $33.1 million, listing on key platforms, and undergoing a Certik audit, demonstrate its ability to compete with industry titans. Investors seeking substantial growth should pay close attention to Rexas Finance. For investors looking to profit from the next wave of blockchain developments, its presale success, continuous activities, and creative use cases make it a convincing option. As it continues to gather momentum, Rexas Finance could beat Solana and Ripple extremely effectively and become a major player in the crypto market by 2025. Website: https://rexas.com Win $1 Million Giveaway: https://bit.ly/Rexas1M Whitepaper: https://rexas.com/rexas-whitepaper.pdf Twitter/X: https://x.com/rexasfinance Telegram: https://t.me/rexasfinance Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp _____________ Disclaimer: Analytics Insight does not provide financial advice or guidance. Also note that the cryptocurrencies mentioned/listed on the website could potentially be scams, i.e. designed to induce you to invest financial resources that may be lost forever and not be recoverable once investments are made. You are responsible for conducting your own research (DYOR) before making any investments. Read more here.

Rarely does a college basketball game provide such stark contrast between the sport's haves and have-nots as when Jackson State faces No. 9 Kentucky on Friday in Lexington, Ky. While Kentucky claims eight NCAA Tournament crowns and the most wins in college basketball history, Jackson State has never won an NCAA Tournament game and enters the matchup looking for its first win of the season. Impressive tradition and current record aside, Kentucky (4-0) returned no scholarship players from last season's team that was knocked off by Oakland in the NCAA Tournament. New coach Mark Pope and his essentially all-new Wildcats are off to a promising start. Through four games, Kentucky is averaging 94.3 points per game, and with 11.5 3-pointers made per game, the team is on pace to set a school record from long distance. The Wildcats boast six double-figure scorers with transfer guards Otega Oweh (from Oklahoma, 15.0 ppg) and Koby Brea (from Dayton, 14.5 ppg) leading the team. The Wildcats defeated Duke 77-72 on Nov. 12 but showed few signs of an emotional letdown in Tuesday's 97-68 win over a Lipscomb team picked to win the Atlantic Sun Conference in the preseason. Kentucky drained a dozen 3-pointers while outrebounding their visitors 43-28. Guard Jaxson Robinson, held to a single point by Duke, dropped 20 points to lead the Kentucky attack. Afterward, Pope praised his team's focus, saying, "The last game was over and it was kind of on to, ‘How do we get better?' That's the only thing we talk about." Lipscomb coach Lennie Acuff also delivered a ringing endorsement, calling Kentucky "the best offensive Power Four team we've played in my six years at Lipscomb." Jackson State (0-5) and third-year coach Mo Williams are looking for something positive to build upon. Not only are the Tigers winless, but they have lost each game by nine or more points. Sophomore guard Jayme Mitchell Jr. (13.8 ppg) is the leading scorer, but the team shoots just 35.8 percent while allowing opponents to shoot 52.3 percent. The Tigers played on Wednesday at Western Kentucky, where they lost 79-62. Reserve Tamarion Hoover had a breakout game with 18 points to lead Jackson State, but the host Hilltoppers canned 14 3-point shots and outrebounded the Tigers 42-35 to grab the win. Earlier, Williams, who played against Kentucky while a student at Alabama, admitted the difficulties of a challenging nonconference schedule for his team. "Our goal is not to win 13 nonconference games," Williams said. "We're already at a disadvantage in that regard. We use these games to get us ready for conference play and for March Madness." Jackson State has not made the NCAA Tournament since 2007. The Tigers had a perfect regular-season record (11-0) in the Southwestern Athletic Conference in 2020-21 but lost in the league tournament. Kentucky has never played Jackson State before, but the game is being billed as part of a Unity Series of matchups in which Kentucky hosts members of the SWAC to raise awareness of Historical Black Colleges and Universities and provide funds for those schools. Past Unity Series opponents have been Southern in December 2021 and Florida A&M in December 2022. --Field Level MediaAccording to reports from GhanaWeb, President-Elect John Dramani Mahama has shared insights on the difficulties of making government appointments following an election. During a mini durbar at the Damongo Palace on December 27, 2024, while visiting the Yegbonwura, Bii-Kunuto Jewu Soale I, Mahama emphasized the importance of selecting capable individuals for cabinet roles—those who prioritize national interests and contribute to effective governance. He highlighted that such decisions often require divine guidance. Mahama expressed the challenge of discerning people’s true intentions and plans for the country, which complicates the process of identifying suitable candidates for key positions. In addressing the Yegbonwura’s inquiries about his appointees, he noted that only through spiritual direction can he appoint individuals who will competently fulfill their roles and serve the nation effectively. He reflected on advice from his father regarding the necessity of surrounding himself with trustworthy individuals who genuinely care for the welfare of Ghanaians. Mahama acknowledged the limitations of human insight, stating that it is impossible to fully understand another person’s thoughts or emotions. He therefore seeks wisdom and discernment to select the right team for advancing economic prosperity in Ghana. Additionally, Mahama has urged religious and traditional leaders to continue their prayers for his administration, emphasizing the need for divine support to govern effectively and address the country’s economic challenges. He noted that the current economic situation is dire and called for collective efforts to improve the circumstances for all Ghanaians.

METRO CHICAGO, Ill. , Dec. 2, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Calamos Investments ®* has announced monthly distributions and sources of distributions paid in December 2024 to shareholders of its seven closed-end funds (the Funds) pursuant to the Funds' respective distribution plans. Fund Distribution Payable date Record date Ex-dividend date CHI (inception 06/26/2002) Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund $0.0950 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CHY (inception 05/28/2003) Calamos Convertible and High Income $0.1000 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 Fund CSQ (inception 03/26/2004) Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $0.1025 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CGO (inception 10/27/2005) Calamos Global Total Return Fund $0.0800 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CHW (inception 06/27/2007) Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund $0.0500 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CCD (inception 03/27/2015) Calamos Dynamic Convertible and $0.1950 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 Income Fund CPZ (inception 11/29/2019) Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust $0.1400 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 The following table provides estimates of Calamos Global Total Return Fund's and Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund's distribution sources, reflecting YTD cumulative experience. The Funds attribute these estimates equally to each regular distribution throughout the year. Distribution Components for December 2024's Payable Date CGO CHW Ordinary Income $0.0000 $0.0000 Short-Term Capital Gains $0.0800 $0.0500 Long-Term Capital Gains $0.0000 $0.0000 Return of Capital $0.0000 $0.0000 Total Distribution (Level Rate) $0.0800 $0.0500 2025 Fiscal YTD Data CGO CHW Ordinary Income $0.0000 $0.0000 Short-Term Capital Gains $0.1600 $0.1000 Long-Term Capital Gains $0.0000 $0.0000 Return of Capital $0.0000 $0.0000 Total Fiscal YTD Distribution (Level Rate) $0.1600 $0.1000 Regarding Calamos' remaining five closed-end funds, which operate under a managed distribution policy: The information below is required by an exemptive order granted to the Funds by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and includes the information sent to shareholders regarding the sources of the Funds' distributions. The following table sets forth the estimated amount of the sources of distribution for purposes of Section 19 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the related rules adopted thereunder. The Funds estimate the following percentages, of their respective total distribution amount per common share, attributable to (i) current and prior fiscal year net investment income, (ii) net realized short-term capital gain, (iii) net realized long- term capital gain and (iv) return of capital or other capital source as a percentage of the total distribution amount. These percentages are disclosed for the current distribution as well as the fiscal YTD cumulative distribution amount per common share for the Funds. The following table provides estimates of each Fund's distribution sources, reflecting YTD cumulative experience. The Funds attribute these estimates equally to each regular distribution throughout the year. Estimated Per Share Sources of Distribution Estimated Percentage of Distribution Per Share Net Short-Term Long-Term Return of Net Short-Term Long-Term Return of Fund Distribution Income Gains Gains Capital Income Gains Gains Capital CHI Current Month 0.0950 - - - 0.0950 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.1900 - 0.0950 - 0.0950 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 10.52 CHY Current Month 0.1000 - - - 0.1000 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.2000 - 0.1000 - 0.1000 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 11.13 CSQ Current Month 0.1025 - - - 0.1025 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.2050 - 0.1025 - 0.1025 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 18.61 CCD Current Month 0.1950 - - - 0.1950 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.3900 - 0.1950 - 0.1950 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 20.33 CPZ Current Month 0.1400 - 0.1400 - - 0.0 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.2800 0.0918 0.1882 - - 32.8 % 67.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Net Asset Value 17.43 Note: NAV returns are as of November 30, 2024 and Distribution Returns include the distribution announced today. You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund's investment performance from the amount of this distribution or from the terms of the Fund's plan. If the Fund(s) estimate(s) that it has distributed more than its income and capital gains, a portion of your distribution may be a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund's investment performance and should not be confused with 'yield' or 'income'. The amounts and sources of distributions reported in this 19(a) notice are only estimates and are not being provided for tax reporting purposes. The actual amounts and sources of the amounts for accounting and tax purposes will depend upon the Fund's investment experience during the remainder of its fiscal year and may be subject to changes based on tax regulations. The Fund will send you a Form 1099 DIV for the calendar year that will tell you how to report these distributions for federal income tax purposes. Return figures provided below are based on the change in the Fund's Net Asset Value per share ("NAV"), compared to the annualized distribution rate for this current distribution as a percentage of the NAV on the last day of the month prior to distribution record date. Annualized Fund 5-Year Fiscal YTD Fiscal YTD Fiscal YTD NAV Return (1) NAV Dist Rate NAV Return NAV Dist Rate CHI 9.38 % 10.84 % 5.65 % 1.81 % CHY 9.60 % 10.78 % 5.61 % 1.80 % CSQ 15.88 % 6.61 % 6.64 % 1.10 % CCD 10.29 % 11.51 % 6.61 % 1.92 % CPZ 6.76 % 9.64 % 0.32 % 1.61 % (1) Since inception for CPZ Note: NAV returns are as of November 30, 2024, and Distribution Returns include the distribution announced today. While the NAV performance may be indicative of the Fund's investment performance, it does not measure the value of a shareholder's investment in the Fund. The value of a shareholder's investment in the Fund is determined by the Fund's market price, which is based on the supply and demand for the Fund's shares in the open market. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Monthly distributions offer shareholders the opportunity to accumulate more shares in a fund via the automatic dividend reinvestment plan. For example, if a fund's shares are trading at a premium, distributions will be automatically reinvested through the plan at NAV or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater; if shares are trading at a discount, distributions will be reinvested at the market price through an open market purchase program. Thus, the plan offers current shareholders an efficient method of accumulating additional shares with a potential for cost savings. Please see the dividend reinvestment plan for more information. Important Notes about Performance and Risk Past performance is no guarantee of future results. As with other investments, market price will fluctuate with the market and upon sale, your shares may have a market price that is above or below net asset value and may be worth more or less than your original investment. Returns at NAV reflect the deduction of the Fund's management fee, debt leverage costs and other expenses. You can purchase or sell common shares daily. Like any other stock, market price will fluctuate with the market. Upon sale, your shares may have a market price that is above or below net asset value and may be worth more or less than your original investment. Shares of closed-end funds frequently trade at a discount which is a market price that is below their net asset value. About Calamos Calamos Investments is a diversified global investment firm offering innovative investment strategies including alternatives, multi-asset, convertible, fixed income, equity, and sustainable equity. The firm offers strategies through separately managed portfolios, mutual funds, closed-end funds, private funds, an interval fund, ETFs, and UCITS funds. Clients include major corporations, pension funds, endowments, foundations and individuals, as well as the financial advisors and consultants who serve them. Headquartered in the Chicago metropolitan area, the firm also has offices in New York City , San Francisco , Milwaukee , Portland ( Oregon ), and the Miami area. For more information, please visit us on LinkedIn , on Twitter @Calamos , Instagram @calamos_investments , or at www.calamos.com . *Calamos Investments LLC, referred to heWEST PALM BEACH, Fla. – President-elect Donald Trump appears to be siding with Elon Musk and his other backers in the tech industry as a dispute over immigration visas has divided his supporters. Trump, in an interview with the New York Post on Saturday, praised the use of visas to bring skilled foreign workers to the U.S. The topic has become a flashpoint within his conservative base. Recommended Videos “I’ve always liked the visas, I have always been in favor of the visas. That’s why we have them," Trump said. In fact, Trump has in the past criticized the H-1B visas, calling them “very bad” and “unfair” for U.S. workers. During his first term as president, he unveiled a “Hire American” policy that directed changes to the program to try to ensure the visas were awarded to the highest-paid or most-skilled applicants. Despite his criticism of them and attempts to curb their use, he has also used the visas at his businesses in the past, something he acknowledged in his interview Saturday. “I have many H-1B visas on my properties. I’ve been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It’s a great program," Trump told the newspaper. He did not appear to address questions about whether he would pursue any changes to the number or use of the visas once he takes office Jan. 20. Trump's hardline immigration policies, focused mostly on immigrants who are in the country illegally, were a cornerstone of his presidential campaign and a priority issue for his supporters. But in recent days, his coalition has split in a public debate largely taking place online about the tech industry's hiring of foreign workers. Hard-right members of Trump's movement have accused Musk and others in Trump's new flank of tech-world supporters of pushing policies at odds with Trump's “America First" vision. Software engineers and others in the tech industry have used H-1B visas for skilled foreign workers and say they are a critical tool for hard-to-fill positions. But critics have said they undercut U.S. citizens who could take those jobs. Some on the right have called for the program to be eliminated.

Darnold gives Vikings another gem with career-high 377 yards in 27-25 win over PackersFormer US president Jimmy Carter dies aged 100

Emirates Flight Training Academy’s record graduate cohort creates steady pilot pipeline for aviationIs ‘Glicked’ the new ‘Barbenheimer’? ‘Wicked’ and ‘Gladiator II’ collide in theaters

CleanSpark Reports Record-Breaking FY 2024 Results: Outpacing Halving and DifficultyBanque Cantonale Vaudoise Acquires New Position in Galiano Gold Inc. (NYSEAMERICAN:GAU)

AMMAN — The Jordan Europe Business Association (JEBA), on Sunday called for enhancing economic ties between Jordan and the European Union, describing these relations as a "key driver for advancing trade and investment cooperation." Mohammad Smadi, board member and promotion director of JEBA, highlighted Jordan's strategic position as a gateway for European access to regional markets, noting that this "unique" role offers significant opportunities in vital sectors such as trade, renewable energy and technology, according to the Jordan news Agency, Petra. He highlighted Jordan's reputation as a stable and secure partner, making it an attractive destination for European investment, particularly in strategic industries. Despite regional geopolitical challenges, the Kingdom has maintained its position as a "reliable hub" for foreign investors, he added. Smadi noted that the European Union is Jordan's second largest trading partner, where trade volume reached JD3.2 billion in 2023, pointing out that Jordan's main exports to Europe include phosphates, fertilisers and pharmaceuticals. He also acknowledged that there are still some challenges hindering Jordanian-EU trade, including high transport costs and the "stringent" standards required by European markets. Smadi estimated that untapped opportunities under existing agreements, such as the Jordan-EU Partnership Agreement, amount to some $777 million. To address these challenges, Smadi called for increased efforts to capitalise on these agreements and boost trade. He pointed to Jordan's Economic Modernisation Vision, which focuses on increasing exports to Europe by improving product quality, training small and medium-sized enterprises, promoting the green economy and upgrading logistics infrastructure to reduce transport costs. In addition, digital transformation is seen as a "key enabler" for Jordanian companies to enter European markets more effectively. "Jordan is not only a gateway to Europe, but also to regional markets such as the Gulf, Iraq and Syria," said Smadi. He added that initiatives such as the Jordanian Railway Project and the Clean Energy Corridor will improve connectivity between Jordan, the region and Europe, creating even greater opportunities for economic cooperation. To further boost trade ties, Smadi suggested specialised training programmes to help Jordanian companies meet European standards and developing joint digital platforms to streamline trade and reduce customs barriers. He emphasised the crucial role of SMEs, which make up 95 per cent of Jordan's economy, in the Kingdom's modernisation efforts. Smadi noted that JEBA plays a key role in fostering partnerships between the Jordanian and European private sectors by organising investment forums, conferences and providing consultancy services to facilitate market entry. He also announced JEBA's plans to host the first Jordan-European Forum under the theme "Digital and Green Jordan", urging European countries to increase their investments in the Kingdom's strategic and vital sectors in a bid to enhance the Kingdom's role as a regional and international economic hub.METRO CHICAGO, Ill. , Dec. 2, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Calamos Investments ®* has announced monthly distributions and sources of distributions paid in December 2024 to shareholders of its seven closed-end funds (the Funds) pursuant to the Funds' respective distribution plans. Fund Distribution Payable date Record date Ex-dividend date CHI (inception 06/26/2002) Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund $0.0950 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CHY (inception 05/28/2003) Calamos Convertible and High Income $0.1000 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 Fund CSQ (inception 03/26/2004) Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $0.1025 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CGO (inception 10/27/2005) Calamos Global Total Return Fund $0.0800 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CHW (inception 06/27/2007) Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund $0.0500 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 CCD (inception 03/27/2015) Calamos Dynamic Convertible and $0.1950 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 Income Fund CPZ (inception 11/29/2019) Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust $0.1400 12/19/24 12/13/24 12/13/24 The following table provides estimates of Calamos Global Total Return Fund's and Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund's distribution sources, reflecting YTD cumulative experience. The Funds attribute these estimates equally to each regular distribution throughout the year. Distribution Components for December 2024's Payable Date CGO CHW Ordinary Income $0.0000 $0.0000 Short-Term Capital Gains $0.0800 $0.0500 Long-Term Capital Gains $0.0000 $0.0000 Return of Capital $0.0000 $0.0000 Total Distribution (Level Rate) $0.0800 $0.0500 2025 Fiscal YTD Data CGO CHW Ordinary Income $0.0000 $0.0000 Short-Term Capital Gains $0.1600 $0.1000 Long-Term Capital Gains $0.0000 $0.0000 Return of Capital $0.0000 $0.0000 Total Fiscal YTD Distribution (Level Rate) $0.1600 $0.1000 Regarding Calamos' remaining five closed-end funds, which operate under a managed distribution policy: The information below is required by an exemptive order granted to the Funds by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and includes the information sent to shareholders regarding the sources of the Funds' distributions. The following table sets forth the estimated amount of the sources of distribution for purposes of Section 19 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the related rules adopted thereunder. The Funds estimate the following percentages, of their respective total distribution amount per common share, attributable to (i) current and prior fiscal year net investment income, (ii) net realized short-term capital gain, (iii) net realized long- term capital gain and (iv) return of capital or other capital source as a percentage of the total distribution amount. These percentages are disclosed for the current distribution as well as the fiscal YTD cumulative distribution amount per common share for the Funds. The following table provides estimates of each Fund's distribution sources, reflecting YTD cumulative experience. The Funds attribute these estimates equally to each regular distribution throughout the year. Estimated Per Share Sources of Distribution Estimated Percentage of Distribution Per Share Net Short-Term Long-Term Return of Net Short-Term Long-Term Return of Fund Distribution Income Gains Gains Capital Income Gains Gains Capital CHI Current Month 0.0950 - - - 0.0950 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.1900 - 0.0950 - 0.0950 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 10.52 CHY Current Month 0.1000 - - - 0.1000 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.2000 - 0.1000 - 0.1000 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 11.13 CSQ Current Month 0.1025 - - - 0.1025 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.2050 - 0.1025 - 0.1025 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 18.61 CCD Current Month 0.1950 - - - 0.1950 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.3900 - 0.1950 - 0.1950 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 50.0 % Net Asset Value 20.33 CPZ Current Month 0.1400 - 0.1400 - - 0.0 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Fiscal YTD 0.2800 0.0918 0.1882 - - 32.8 % 67.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Net Asset Value 17.43 Note: NAV returns are as of November 30, 2024 and Distribution Returns include the distribution announced today. You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund's investment performance from the amount of this distribution or from the terms of the Fund's plan. If the Fund(s) estimate(s) that it has distributed more than its income and capital gains, a portion of your distribution may be a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund's investment performance and should not be confused with 'yield' or 'income'. The amounts and sources of distributions reported in this 19(a) notice are only estimates and are not being provided for tax reporting purposes. The actual amounts and sources of the amounts for accounting and tax purposes will depend upon the Fund's investment experience during the remainder of its fiscal year and may be subject to changes based on tax regulations. The Fund will send you a Form 1099 DIV for the calendar year that will tell you how to report these distributions for federal income tax purposes. Return figures provided below are based on the change in the Fund's Net Asset Value per share ("NAV"), compared to the annualized distribution rate for this current distribution as a percentage of the NAV on the last day of the month prior to distribution record date. Annualized Fund 5-Year Fiscal YTD Fiscal YTD Fiscal YTD NAV Return (1) NAV Dist Rate NAV Return NAV Dist Rate CHI 9.38 % 10.84 % 5.65 % 1.81 % CHY 9.60 % 10.78 % 5.61 % 1.80 % CSQ 15.88 % 6.61 % 6.64 % 1.10 % CCD 10.29 % 11.51 % 6.61 % 1.92 % CPZ 6.76 % 9.64 % 0.32 % 1.61 % (1) Since inception for CPZ Note: NAV returns are as of November 30, 2024, and Distribution Returns include the distribution announced today. While the NAV performance may be indicative of the Fund's investment performance, it does not measure the value of a shareholder's investment in the Fund. The value of a shareholder's investment in the Fund is determined by the Fund's market price, which is based on the supply and demand for the Fund's shares in the open market. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Monthly distributions offer shareholders the opportunity to accumulate more shares in a fund via the automatic dividend reinvestment plan. For example, if a fund's shares are trading at a premium, distributions will be automatically reinvested through the plan at NAV or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater; if shares are trading at a discount, distributions will be reinvested at the market price through an open market purchase program. Thus, the plan offers current shareholders an efficient method of accumulating additional shares with a potential for cost savings. Please see the dividend reinvestment plan for more information. Important Notes about Performance and Risk Past performance is no guarantee of future results. As with other investments, market price will fluctuate with the market and upon sale, your shares may have a market price that is above or below net asset value and may be worth more or less than your original investment. Returns at NAV reflect the deduction of the Fund's management fee, debt leverage costs and other expenses. You can purchase or sell common shares daily. Like any other stock, market price will fluctuate with the market. Upon sale, your shares may have a market price that is above or below net asset value and may be worth more or less than your original investment. Shares of closed-end funds frequently trade at a discount which is a market price that is below their net asset value. About Calamos Calamos Investments is a diversified global investment firm offering innovative investment strategies including alternatives, multi-asset, convertible, fixed income, equity, and sustainable equity. The firm offers strategies through separately managed portfolios, mutual funds, closed-end funds, private funds, an interval fund, ETFs, and UCITS funds. Clients include major corporations, pension funds, endowments, foundations and individuals, as well as the financial advisors and consultants who serve them. Headquartered in the Chicago metropolitan area, the firm also has offices in New York City , San Francisco , Milwaukee , Portland ( Oregon ), and the Miami area. For more information, please visit us on LinkedIn , on Twitter @Calamos , Instagram @calamos_investments , or at www.calamos.com . *Calamos Investments LLC, referred to he

Nio ( NIO 2.98% ) told investors it hit a critical milestone in becoming a self-sustaining business. *Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of Nov. 20, 2024. The video was published on Nov. 22, 2024.DePaul cruises to win over Loyola Maryland

Top-ranked chess player Magnus Carlsen is headed back to the World Blitz Championship on Monday after its governing body agreed to loosen a dress code that got him fined and denied a late-round game in another tournament for refusing to change out of jeans . Lamenting the contretemps, International Chess Federation President Arkady Dvorkovich said in a statement Sunday that he'd let World Blitz Championship tournament officials consider allowing "appropriate jeans" with a jacket, and other "elegant minor deviations" from the dress code. He said Carlsen's stand — which culminated in his quitting the tournament Friday — highlighted a need for more discussion "to ensure that our rules and their application reflect the evolving nature of chess as a global and accessible sport." Carlsen, meanwhile, said in a video posted Sunday on social media that he would play — and wear jeans — in the World Blitz Championship when it begins Monday. "I think the situation was badly mishandled on their side," the 34-year-old Norwegian grandmaster said. But he added that he loves playing blitz — a fast-paced form of chess — and wanted fans to be able to watch, and that he was encouraged by his discussions with the federation after Friday's showdown. "I think we sort of all want the same thing," he suggested in the video on his Take Take Take chess app's YouTube channel. "We want the players to be comfortable, sure, but also relatively presentable." The events began when Carlsen wore jeans and a sportcoat Friday to the Rapid World Championship, which is separate from but held in conjunction with the blitz event. The chess federation said Friday that longstanding rules prohibit jeans at those tournaments, and players are lodged nearby to make sartorial switch-ups easy if needed. An official fined Carlsen $200 and asked him to change pants, but he refused and wasn't paired for a ninth-round game, the federation said at the time. The organization noted that another grandmaster, Ian Nepomniachtchi, was fined earlier in the day for wearing sports shoes, changed and continued to play. Carlsen has said that he offered to wear something else the next day, but officials were unyielding. He said "it became a bit of a matter of principle," so he quit the rapid and blitz championships. In the video posted Sunday, he questioned whether he had indeed broken a rule and said changing clothes would have needlessly interrupted his concentration between games. He called the punishment "unbelievably harsh." "Of course, I could have changed. Obviously, I didn't want to," he said, and "I stand by that." Chess

Previous:
Next: nuebe gaming legit